iPad – full Internet my ASS


Disclaimer: I am an Adobe employee and these views are my own.

Yesterday we saw the launch of the iPad from Apple, and we were taken on the whirlwind of marketing showmanship.  The iPad is undoubtedly a revolutionary product, and just like the iPhone OS, Apple are clearly set on a path to close down the web and ultimately markets for books and magazines, just as they did with music.  Well maybe this is a good thing for sales and the Apple stock price, but the Internet is meant to be more for those who use it.  Fundamentally it’s an information, education and entertainment tool founded on open innovation.  How can a liberal company try and lock it down??

Why would a student seriously want to go to the library?  That’s so 1980!

The keynote by Steve Jobs yesterday was, as always, a masterpiece of marketing and you will have undoubtedly seen the “plug-in missing” boxes throughout the browsing demo.  Apple told us that “a new device must be better at some things”, defining the iPad as “the best browsing experience of any device”; he even included laptops in that definition.

Is that an ignorant statement?  Obviously not, Steve is a very smart guy so I think he’s in the business of redefining what the web is.  Maybe he’ll brand it the iNet.



The interesting part of this keynote was in their pitch, you see Apple is staffed with smart people, so everything about the pitch was deliberate.  When browsing the web at the New York Times, Time and National Geographic websites Steve paused momentarily to show that Flash was missing.  He’s a perfectionist, so why do you think he would do that?

Well I believe that Apple were declaring that the web does not need or want Flash, that includes me with my Macbook Pro, 2 iPhones and an iPod Touch.  For consumers it is extremely misleading to talk about a web without Flash, in fact any plugin or common technology.  How do I know that? Well millions of iPhone users are visiting our Flash Player download page in the vein hope that they’ll be able to watch Hulu, iPlayer, 4OD and any number of sites.  They don’t necessarily know what Flash is, but ~700million of them know that they could visit these pages and engage with the content on their desktop computer.

Is it fundamentally wrong to describe the modern web as “complete”, without the plugins that have existed for almost as long as it has?  Plugins that many see as the leaders of, and a required element of, web innovation?

At Adobe we believe in an open web, one where plugins like Flash and PDF Reader, Unity3D, Gears and even Silverlight can all co-exist and compete on fair terms.  We work extremely hard to bring Flash to all devices, and lately of course we have invested a huge effort in bringing the Flash Platform to mobile devices too.  Today we’re working with 19 of the top 20 manufacturers of mobile phones within the Open Screen Project; but not Apple, and certainly not for the want of trying.

To make matters worse, the problems didn’t end with Flash being absent on the iPad.  Apple also launched the iBookStore, a separate and new store for Books and I presume magazines or articles in time.  In essence this is a great step forward for many, and Apple has elected to the use the EPub format which is fully supported in InDesign CS4.

So what gives?  It’s all in the detail, the DRM, user locked, device locked detail.  Forget sharing your books and movies, forget reading your books on your laptop sometimes or transferring them onto any other device.

In sum, I am hugely disappointed in Apple’s iPad and I feel that the vast majority of consumers will reject it; as long as Apple come clean about its shortcomings first.

  1. #1 by Aaron Franco on January 29, 2010 - 1:03 am

    Web pages do not “Fall back” to Flash. Flash falls back to web pages.

    The statement “Apple are clearly set on a path to close down the web” is something I hadn’t considered. It is very fitting to the Apple business model.

    Flash is the way forward for standardizing the internet. The Flash Player as a closed platform is already a standard. It is also the most prominent form of Video on the internet and has a huge open source community backing it up.

    I’ve blogged about it here:
    http://blog.nothinggrinder.com/future-of-web-video

  2. #2 by William on January 29, 2010 - 8:44 am

    “I feel that the vast majority of consumers will reject it”

    I doubt that:
    did they reject outdated iphone 1&2 ?
    did they reject iPod and its locked format ?

    Look, everywhere you see “iPad is a revolution”
    I still can’t understand how tech journalist can forget Archos and others companies which released or plan to release tablet of this kind…
    based on Maemo, Android or other Linux distrib…so more or less open…

    Look at Scott Janousek blog, he loves to find all these kind of toys ;)

    • #3 by Mark Doherty on January 29, 2010 - 7:13 pm

      Hi William, it could be argued that users may not care just because it’s an Apple device. However I do think Apple has a responsibility to inform their customers that Flash is not available, and that it’s their decision to provide a cut-down Internet browsing experience.

      Time will tell, but my main issue is that Apple are miss-selling their devices, and I’m not the only one that agrees. In the UK the Advertising standards authority pulled one of their ads that suggested users could view the whole web on the iPhone.
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/aug/27/apple.apple

  3. #4 by ron on January 29, 2010 - 3:21 pm

    Flash is a CPU eater. Adobe – fix it or forget it.

    • #5 by Mark Doherty on January 29, 2010 - 7:01 pm

      Hi Ron, You ought to qualify those statements better? CPU eater on what? what browser? platform? Have you filed a bug?

  4. #6 by Bud on January 30, 2010 - 5:29 am

    If Flash never became a video wrapper, this may never have become an issue.

    Once you shave Flash down to something efficient that doesn’t crash a lot of sites outside of the devices that refuse to use it, has anyone at Adobe considered that Flash is generally a single touch interface? Not that you need multitouch, you could just ignore the second touch or ‘mouse down’ whatever.

    • #7 by Mark Doherty on January 30, 2010 - 5:18 pm

      Hi Bud,

      With Flash Player 10.1 we have added complete multi-touch interfaces for Flash content, it’s a non-issue already.

      Crashes are horrible and we work to fix these issues as soon as we see them, at time however we are working within constraints imposed by different browsers and host platforms. It is not always the fault of Flash per se.

      Mark

  5. #8 by jadezoole on January 30, 2010 - 7:40 pm

    I fully understand the state of the article. Flash is part of the web nowadays, and Apple will face a lot of issues if want to build a walled garden device like this. Youtube is must for internet users, and its really funny in 2010 that a device cant provide it for its user.
    Apple should change its mind, and find other business models. This walled garden is outdated!

  6. #9 by chall3ng3r on January 31, 2010 - 3:27 pm

    Well said Mark, I agree with you.

    Apple’s hardware has been closed since start. It’s OS is also locked to work on Apple-only devices (I call it Apple Firmware).

    Apple’s mobile devices are just status symbols. i.e. I’m rich / i’m a fanboy :D

    For real world use, the user have to pull out his Nokia S60 / Nokia N900 or WinMo / Android based device.

    BTW, I liked the title of the post :P

    // chall3ng3r //

  7. #10 by eyeclipse on February 3, 2010 - 9:22 am

    Hi Mark! iPad bring us an amazing debate :D
    I agree with you in so many points, but I try to gone too far in my post.

    http://spacecollective.org/eyeclipse/5542/What-have-to-sacrified-to-redefine-the-personal-computer

    I think the last paragraph will be interesting for you.
    See you at DeviceDays!

  8. #11 by aristophrenia on February 3, 2010 - 11:58 am

    Flash is the best standard on the internet – html5 is a very, very poor version of flash 7 – it is at best 5 years behind the times. All I can see coming with html5 is a flood of graphics intensive animations which will kill processors as poor coders attempt to emulate flash from 5 years ago which will not work on multiple browsers or platforms. The joy people are expressing in html5 is that it can do what flash has been able to do for years – why not just learn flash – moronic in the extreme.

  9. #12 by Mike Duguid on February 5, 2010 - 11:12 pm

    Interestingly, was browsing on a nokia 5800 today using the native browser and came across a full screen flash site. It worked surprisingly well considering there was a fair bit of animation, frame rate was perhaps about visibly slower than on a desktop but not unusable.

    • #13 by Mark Doherty on February 6, 2010 - 6:53 pm

      Hi Mike, The 5800 device ships now with Flash Lite 3.1 which enables almost all AS2 content to play back given enough RAM. In our own tests we certify against the top 500 websites, and we think today that it’s capable of rendering about 75% of Flash content on the web. Not bad for a “lite” version!

Comments are closed.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes